Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes, it is effective. We have several NASA/NOAA satellites with IR instruments on them that are used for fire detection. These are obviously much more useful for detecting fires that start in very rural areas under moderate conditions. The current crop of fires in LA are all very close to populated areas and spread fast, so satellite mapping wasn't of any use for detection. Also, California in particular has a really great fleet of IR mapping planes that give firefighters and the public much more detailed fire information than the satellite coverage, but when I lived in Oregon where they don't have a similar system, the satellite coverage was often the most up to date information on fire perimeters.


Seems like it would be logistically difficult to be able to drop a significant amount of water anywhere in, say, 15 minutes.

With dry conditions and high winds, that is an extremely slow response to an uncontrolled fire...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: