The article says exactly why they moved to microservices: too many teams were deploying the monolith and it slowed them down.
The article also says why they are moving back to a monolith: the services in question are legacy and being replaced, and only one team is maintaining them, so the reason they moved to microservices no longer applies. In addition, combining the services makes their lives easier enough that it’s worth it from their perspective.
Your aggressive tone and assumption that they didn’t have good reasons for what they’re doing is why I said you were “rushing to express superiority.”
The article also says why they are moving back to a monolith: the services in question are legacy and being replaced, and only one team is maintaining them, so the reason they moved to microservices no longer applies. In addition, combining the services makes their lives easier enough that it’s worth it from their perspective.
Your aggressive tone and assumption that they didn’t have good reasons for what they’re doing is why I said you were “rushing to express superiority.”