Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That should be illegal.


It used to be, moreso. [1]

The legal 'bite' that has been attempted to be used to make these tactics work in the US (with varying success) is the DMCA. [2] [3] [4]. The argument goes, if you try to break the mechanism that locks down the print cartridge, that counts as circumventing a copy protection device. [5]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment,_I....

[2] https://www.cnet.com/news/lexmark-invokes-dmca-in-toner-suit...

[3] http://brandonw.net/skylanders/activision.pdf

[4] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/23/texas_instruments_ca...

[5] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201


Sorry USA can't hear you over the sound of freedom.


It's more a problem of the free market. When companies grow larger and larger, the stuff they produce tends to become more and more locked down. So a freedom naturally leads to a loss of freedom elsewhere.


> So a freedom naturally leads to a loss of freedom elsewhere.

No. It is willingness to abuse others when it is possible to get away with it. It is a matter of morality and conscience, nothing natural.


Many people claim that a company has no conscience and can do anything as long as it's within the boundaries of the law.


And they are right; company has no conscience.

The people making up the company should have. That is, unless they want to live in a society, where homo homini lupus est.


But they're abusing copyright law to restrict your freedom to use your own cartridges. We're technically able to do that, but HP will take all your money if you do.


Isn't running out of ink something that requires a "repair" of the printer... So it should be covered under right to repair.


This is a theoretical right people are calling for, not any actual right people have right now.


It should be, but so far this hasn't been successful in court. I'm not sure if it has been tried.

Best to write your congressman first. When the laws are clearly success in court is more likely. Right now HP is twisting some legal arguments in a way that holds up to the letter of the law.


Instead, circumventing it is illegal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: