Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

To repeat myself because I think it's worth being clear about this: we have enough insight to know that the premise of ballots being randomized statewide does not hold, at all. The reason we were all hitting refresh on Wasserman and Cohn's feeds on Twitter was that each Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday batch was attributed to a specific county, and we had expectations about what returns in those counties would look like.


This pretty much adds up, and invalidates the whole analysis in my opinion.

But I still believe that the first conspicuous batch of mail-in ballots being dumped in the witching hour, after poll watchers were told the counting was done for the night, is fishy, and I will not be surprised if the court considers it part of a larger pattern of behavior which causes ballots (legitimate but unverifiable, in many cases) to be thrown out.


The first couple days the big counties were counting 24/7. The managers were on TV talking about their teams, and you could watch live streams on many of the counting areas.

The court is likely throwing nothing out. The no poll watcher lawsuit was already laughed out of court when the lawyers had to admit a 'non-zero' number of poll watchers were present the whole time [1]. Trump might be fine lying on Twitter constantly, but in court his lawyers would prefer to not commit perjury.

[1] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fact-check-trumps-claims-poll-w...


There are many sworn affidavits being filed in court right now, from poll watchers claiming that they were kept too far away to validate a single ballot, or turned away entirely. We’ll see, it will definitely go to court.


Read the fact check. The too far away claim was decided days ago, and people were allowed to be within 6'. There were also live webcams setup. This has literally been one of the most transparent elections in history.

Read through the lawsuits [1]. Most have already been rejected due to no proof. The others outstanding have to do with so few votes it doesn't matter or they actually go against Trump's interests, like stopping the count when he's behind. This is all theater at this point. Maybe they can have a few more press conferences at the garden center next to the sex shop.

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-campaign-lawsuits-elec...


If one of the new cases filed this week makes it to SCOTUS will you admit you were wrong?


I think I speak for all of us when I say that nobody is going to validate that weird Twitter thread you posted, no matter what happens at SCOTUS.


Of course not, I’ve already said so. Are you being willfully ignorant?


I'm interested in discussing facts, I'm not interested in playing "Time for some game theory" on HN. Sorry.


Note also the extremely telling detail that Trump's WinRed links for fundraising the recounts and legal challenges allocate 60% of those funds to retiring his campaign debt.


Exactly. I was trying to stay away from pointing out that Trump was trying to scam him followers one last time before leaving office, but here we are.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: